For this blog, I decided to share my list of books read for the year 2010 and let you know my choices for "best book" of genre and "best book" I read this year. I call it the "Billiam Award." An "*" indicates that it was I book I reread and it wasn't eligible for the "Billiam." Here is the list...
Fiction (Juvenile)
Theodore Boone: Kid Lawyer—Grisham
The Outsiders-Hinton*
The Teacher’s Funeral- Peck
Stargirl- Spinelli
Tuck Everlasting-Babbitt
How Angel Peterson Got His Name-Paulsen
Diary of a Wimpy Kid: Dog Days- Kinney
Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone-Rowling*
Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows-Rowling*
The Giver-Lowry
Bridge to Terabithia-Paterson
Son of Liberty- Massie
Fiction (General)
The Chamber-Grisham*
The Appeal-Grisham*
The Last Juror-Grisham*
Ford County-Grisham
The King of Torts-Grisham*
The Testament-Grisham*
Playing for Pizza-Grisham*
Bleachers- Grisham*
A Time to Kill-Grisham*
For One More Day-Albom*
The Fire Gospel-Faber
Elmer Gantry-Lewis
To Kill A Mockingbird-Lee
Anthem- Rand
Of Mice and Men-Steinbeck
The Lovely Bones-Sebold
Non Fiction (General)
The Innocent Man-Grisham*
Unlikely Disciple- Roose
My Personal Best- Wooden
Going Rogue- Palin
Worth Fighting For: The Education of a Maverick- McCain and Salter
Dutch- Morris*
A Matter of Character: Inside the Bush White House- Kessler
Game Change-Halperin and Heilemann
Bible Study/Devotional
Preacher, You’ve Got Friends- Hollis
90 Minutes in Heaven- Piper
Preaching- Miller
Biblical Preaching- Robinson
The Effective Invitation- Streett
Fearless- Lucado
God Came Near- Lucado*
Crazy Love- Chan
The Screwtape Letters- Lewis*
Game Plan for Life- Gibbs
Blue Like Jazz- Miller*
Living by the Book-Hendricks
Between Two Worlds- Stott
A Primer on Biblical Preaching- Sutton
Preaching that Changes Lives-Fabarez
When God Whispers Your Name-Lucado*
Christian Fiction
The Bride Collector- Dekker
Boneman’s Daughters- Dekker
Obesessed- Dekker
Thr3e- Dekker
Kiss- Dekker and Healy
House- Dekker and Peretti
Immanuel’s Veins- Dekker
The Dead Whisper On- Hines
The Unseen- Hines
Blink of an Eye- Dekker
"Billiam" Nominees
Juvenille Fiction: Bridge To Terabithia (Paterson)- A wonderful story of friendship and imagination. The recent movie is good, but not nearly as good as the book.
Fiction: To Kill A Mockingbird (Lee)- I think this is the best American novel of all time. Like "Bridge To Terabithia," it is a movie, but the book is far superior.
Non-Fiction (General): Game Change (Halperin and Heilemann)- The best political book I read this year. Wonderful behind the scenes insight into the 2008 Presidential Election. This book is not for the squeamish. It will shatter some of your preconceived notions.
Bible Study/Devotional: Living By The Book (Hendricks)- The most practical Christian book I've ever read. How do you begin to study the Bible? A great read.
Christian Fiction: Immanuel's Veins (Dekker) I did a review for this and it was very close to winning the "Billiam." I really like this book, a lot. It is a bit quirky (and so am I), so I thought my liking it might reflect that. Great story of sacrificial love. I've read none better.
"Billiam" Winner 2010: To Kill A Mockingbird (Lee)
I would challenge everyone to keep a reading list for 2011 and read at least a book a month. There is a lot of great literature and much to be gained by investing yourself and your time in a good book. Maybe you'll find a book on my list that will interest you. I have a few book reviews on this blog. Check them out, too. Have a Merry and Blessed Christmas and may God bless you in 2011. Thanks for reading... and, by all means, read on!
Monday, December 20, 2010
Tuesday, November 9, 2010
Book Review
For the class I am taking at Liberty University I had to read Howard Hendricks and his son William's tome, Living By The Book. I found this to be an incredible resource that was both inspiring and convicting. I thought I would post my review of this book here. I hope that those who teach/challenge others to read the Bible will get this book.
“The Bible was not written to satisfy your curiosity; it was written to transform your life (p. 290). This statement, in my opinion, is the heart and soul of Professor Hendricks’ classic work on Bible study, Living by the Book. Professor Hendricks and his son William updated this book, first published in 1991, to speak to a world that has changed dramatically in the last two decades. Living by the Book is a comprehensive look at how people should begin the process of Bible study. On the surface that does not seem to be such a difficult challenge. Almost everyone who has been in church for any length of time has heard a well-meaning church leader tell them to “get in the Word.” I know in my own ministry that I uttered words like that. Reading this book was somewhat convicting, though. While Christian leaders urge others to study the Bible, we don’t often equip them to do it well. This book provides such instruction.
The book highlights three steps for effective Bible study: observation, interpretation and application. Under each of these steps are a host of strategies, questions and suggestions. Unlike other study books of this type, Hendricks includes “You Try It” exercise at the end of each chapter to practice the emphasis of that particular chapter. All of them are good tools. I found the “You Try It” at the end of “Things That Are Emphasized” helpful. Charting both texts mentioned in that exercise was important for me and something that I don’t normally do. Looking at Daniel 1 and 2 under the topic of context was also a meaningful “You Try It” challenge. In Living by the Book, Hendricks presents a straight-forward approach to handling the Word. He starts with the need to read a verse, suggests how one should read and for what a reader should be looking. He then moves to the interpretation stage. His comments here are especially significant. I think he is right in his assertion that many people jump to this stage first. Before really looking at and reading a text, they “fire off” interpretations of passages that are, at best, “unusual,” and, at worst, “heretical.” He also warns about staying in this stage. It isn’t enough to know what it means; it must be applied to life. That is how he concludes the book.
The strengths of the book are evident. The book addresses a topic that, as I see it, is rarely mentioned. It provides a well-structured, disciplined approach to studying the Word of God. It doesn’t apologize for the need to work at and be persistent in reading and studying, but it also recognizes that not all who want and need to study the Bible come to it with the same set of skills. I think the book would make an excellent study in a small group or Sunday School class. That leads to what I think may be the book’s only weakness, if it has one at all. The book is very long. I can see it being taught in a seminary or Bible college where classes meet more than just once a week. In a church setting, it might need to be condensed to accommodate how most churches approach classes and studies.
I would recommend this book to anyone who wanted to develop skills in handling the Word of Truth.
“The Bible was not written to satisfy your curiosity; it was written to transform your life (p. 290). This statement, in my opinion, is the heart and soul of Professor Hendricks’ classic work on Bible study, Living by the Book. Professor Hendricks and his son William updated this book, first published in 1991, to speak to a world that has changed dramatically in the last two decades. Living by the Book is a comprehensive look at how people should begin the process of Bible study. On the surface that does not seem to be such a difficult challenge. Almost everyone who has been in church for any length of time has heard a well-meaning church leader tell them to “get in the Word.” I know in my own ministry that I uttered words like that. Reading this book was somewhat convicting, though. While Christian leaders urge others to study the Bible, we don’t often equip them to do it well. This book provides such instruction.
The book highlights three steps for effective Bible study: observation, interpretation and application. Under each of these steps are a host of strategies, questions and suggestions. Unlike other study books of this type, Hendricks includes “You Try It” exercise at the end of each chapter to practice the emphasis of that particular chapter. All of them are good tools. I found the “You Try It” at the end of “Things That Are Emphasized” helpful. Charting both texts mentioned in that exercise was important for me and something that I don’t normally do. Looking at Daniel 1 and 2 under the topic of context was also a meaningful “You Try It” challenge. In Living by the Book, Hendricks presents a straight-forward approach to handling the Word. He starts with the need to read a verse, suggests how one should read and for what a reader should be looking. He then moves to the interpretation stage. His comments here are especially significant. I think he is right in his assertion that many people jump to this stage first. Before really looking at and reading a text, they “fire off” interpretations of passages that are, at best, “unusual,” and, at worst, “heretical.” He also warns about staying in this stage. It isn’t enough to know what it means; it must be applied to life. That is how he concludes the book.
The strengths of the book are evident. The book addresses a topic that, as I see it, is rarely mentioned. It provides a well-structured, disciplined approach to studying the Word of God. It doesn’t apologize for the need to work at and be persistent in reading and studying, but it also recognizes that not all who want and need to study the Bible come to it with the same set of skills. I think the book would make an excellent study in a small group or Sunday School class. That leads to what I think may be the book’s only weakness, if it has one at all. The book is very long. I can see it being taught in a seminary or Bible college where classes meet more than just once a week. In a church setting, it might need to be condensed to accommodate how most churches approach classes and studies.
I would recommend this book to anyone who wanted to develop skills in handling the Word of Truth.
Friday, October 22, 2010
One Christian's View of Islam and the Current Controversy
Juan Williams is a liberal/progressive analyst for Fox News. He also used to be a commentator for NPR (National Public Radio)until he was fired this week for saying "inappropriate" things with respect to fearing Muslims on an airplane. Just a week or so earlier, Bill O'Reilly had a "run in" with some of the ladies on "The View" and his comment that "Muslims attacked us on 9/11" caused Joy Behar and Whoopi Goldberg to walk off the set in disgust. As I see and hear it, there is a controversy brewing with respect to how Americans ought to view Muslims. President George W. Bush made it clear, at the time of the attack of 9/11, that we were not at war with Islam. He attended services at a few different mosques and made connections with some Muslim clerics to build relationships around the world. The discussion has changed a bit under President Barack Obama. The phrase "war on terror" has been removed from the dialog and it is politically incorrect to say that "Muslims attacked the U.S on 9/11." Instead, the "correct" way to state it is that "extremists" were responsible for the 9/11 attacks. I am certain that conservatives and progressives will continue this debate through the mid-term election and beyond. I have a political opinion about this, of course (are you surprised??). However, I have more recently tried to think about the controversy through the lens of my faith. How should I, as a Christian, view Islam, terror, jihad and Sharia law?
The issue came into focus for me while reading yet another Ted Dekker book, "Blink of an Eye." In this book, written in 2002 and reprinted in 2007, he tells the fictional story of Miriam, a Saudi princess, who flees persecution and possible death in her own country to pursue freedom and love. Dekker's story is fictional but his accounts of brutality, oppression and torture of people by Muslim extremists is horribly accurate according to what I have read. I understand, both from reading his book and researching Islam,that not every Muslim reads and interprets the Koran or Qur'an the same way. Like the Pharisees and Sadduccees of the Old Testament, there are different sects of Muslims (Sunni and Shia most notably) who have different interpretations of the law (Sharia law). I understand that not every Muslim takes a "literal" view. However, I must admit, it is hard for me to understand how American "liberals" can support or be sympathetic of a "theology" that so demeans women.
What ought to be my response as a Christian to all of this? In looking at the historical roots of Islam, I discovered some of what the early Christians thought of it. In Dante's "Inferno" the prophet Muhammad is depicted as split in half, indicating his split from the Christian church. The monk Bede wrote a long argument detailing how the Islamic faith came from Ishmael the son of Hagar and Abraham. He noted how Ismael's "hand would be against everyone and everyone's hand against him." More recently Franklin Graham spoke of Islam as "evil" and "wicked." Is this the "right" view for Christians to hold?
I can honestly say I don't know; not for certain anyway. I think it is clear that a Bible believing Christian has to see Islam as a false religion. As John notes in John 14, Jesus said, "No man comes to the Father but by me." As a Christian I think I have the responsibility to show the love of Christ to all who don't know him as Savior. This would apply to Muslims. Is Islam an "evil" and "oppressive" religion or have some hijacked this faith and made into something different? I'm not wise enough to say. My response as a Christian, however, seems to be pretty clear. Love as Jesus would and try to show an example of his grace.
As an American, though, I can understand what Juan Williams was saying. While it may not be all of Islam that has declared "jihad" (holy war), certainly a part of the Muslim world has. Muslims who believe these actions to be abhorrent should denounce them. Westerners should be wary and wise. These are difficult times.
Thanks for reading...
The issue came into focus for me while reading yet another Ted Dekker book, "Blink of an Eye." In this book, written in 2002 and reprinted in 2007, he tells the fictional story of Miriam, a Saudi princess, who flees persecution and possible death in her own country to pursue freedom and love. Dekker's story is fictional but his accounts of brutality, oppression and torture of people by Muslim extremists is horribly accurate according to what I have read. I understand, both from reading his book and researching Islam,that not every Muslim reads and interprets the Koran or Qur'an the same way. Like the Pharisees and Sadduccees of the Old Testament, there are different sects of Muslims (Sunni and Shia most notably) who have different interpretations of the law (Sharia law). I understand that not every Muslim takes a "literal" view. However, I must admit, it is hard for me to understand how American "liberals" can support or be sympathetic of a "theology" that so demeans women.
What ought to be my response as a Christian to all of this? In looking at the historical roots of Islam, I discovered some of what the early Christians thought of it. In Dante's "Inferno" the prophet Muhammad is depicted as split in half, indicating his split from the Christian church. The monk Bede wrote a long argument detailing how the Islamic faith came from Ishmael the son of Hagar and Abraham. He noted how Ismael's "hand would be against everyone and everyone's hand against him." More recently Franklin Graham spoke of Islam as "evil" and "wicked." Is this the "right" view for Christians to hold?
I can honestly say I don't know; not for certain anyway. I think it is clear that a Bible believing Christian has to see Islam as a false religion. As John notes in John 14, Jesus said, "No man comes to the Father but by me." As a Christian I think I have the responsibility to show the love of Christ to all who don't know him as Savior. This would apply to Muslims. Is Islam an "evil" and "oppressive" religion or have some hijacked this faith and made into something different? I'm not wise enough to say. My response as a Christian, however, seems to be pretty clear. Love as Jesus would and try to show an example of his grace.
As an American, though, I can understand what Juan Williams was saying. While it may not be all of Islam that has declared "jihad" (holy war), certainly a part of the Muslim world has. Muslims who believe these actions to be abhorrent should denounce them. Westerners should be wary and wise. These are difficult times.
Thanks for reading...
Wednesday, October 6, 2010
Unruled Frontier?
Last week the nation was shocked by the tragic suicide of Tyler Clementi. The circumstances surrounding the awful episode were even more disturbing. Clementi's roommate and one other student are accused of using a hidden camera to catch Clementi in what he thought was a private moment in his room with another man. This video was then posted on the internet for the world to see. Clementi was mortified and felt, I suppose, unable to deal with the situation, so he took his own life.
While I can somewhat understand the mortification and the reaction of the young man, though I wish he'd chosen a different solution, it is hard for me, an admitted "old man" of forty-five, to understand the cruelty and callousness of the other two young people accused in this episode. I am still at Union Middle School in good old Union, Missouri. This year I am working in the OCS Room (that's off campus suspension for you in Kansas). Yesterday I spent the last thirty minutes talking to my five boys and one girl about why they think their generation can be so "mean" or "cruel." I was a bit surprised at the "straight" answers that they gave me.
"We don't know right from wrong and aren't told or shown by anyone."
"Kids today don't have any discipline."
"They get away with acting disrespectful and their parents let them."
The kids I have did not shirk from responsibility as they agreed that they, too, at times, were guilty of these same things. They seemed to be wanting a bit more structure and rules. I then sought their opinions on the internet and facebook. Should there be rules for what is posted? I think about Kimber and those of her generation. They are so much more technologically advanced than I am. The kids in my OCS class can set up and "fix" computers far better than I can. I know that I am out of my league discussing technology and may be like "Don Quixote," but I think there should be some basic internet rules. My young kids agreed. Here is what we came up with. Consider them...
1. Do not post anything on the internet that would bring harm or embarrassment to someone else. The Biblical injunction for this is clear. "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you" (Matthew 7:12). "Do not let any unwholesome talk come out of your mouths, but only what is helpful for building others up according to their needs" (Ephesians 4:29).
2. Post things that have something to say. The idea here is to elevate the level of discussion. Too much trash enters the mind through the internet. Don't be a distributor of trash. Paul reminds us in Philippians 4:8 to think on things that are "lovely," excellent," "true," "noble" and "praiseworthy." Our minds and our posts ought to reflect the same standard.
These are two basic rules that a little OCS class in the small town of Union, MO agreed would help. I know it is a bit like "tilting at windmills," but to erase cruelty one person at a time might help. I hope you think about it. In Room 6 of the SRC, we will.
Thanks for reading...
While I can somewhat understand the mortification and the reaction of the young man, though I wish he'd chosen a different solution, it is hard for me, an admitted "old man" of forty-five, to understand the cruelty and callousness of the other two young people accused in this episode. I am still at Union Middle School in good old Union, Missouri. This year I am working in the OCS Room (that's off campus suspension for you in Kansas). Yesterday I spent the last thirty minutes talking to my five boys and one girl about why they think their generation can be so "mean" or "cruel." I was a bit surprised at the "straight" answers that they gave me.
"We don't know right from wrong and aren't told or shown by anyone."
"Kids today don't have any discipline."
"They get away with acting disrespectful and their parents let them."
The kids I have did not shirk from responsibility as they agreed that they, too, at times, were guilty of these same things. They seemed to be wanting a bit more structure and rules. I then sought their opinions on the internet and facebook. Should there be rules for what is posted? I think about Kimber and those of her generation. They are so much more technologically advanced than I am. The kids in my OCS class can set up and "fix" computers far better than I can. I know that I am out of my league discussing technology and may be like "Don Quixote," but I think there should be some basic internet rules. My young kids agreed. Here is what we came up with. Consider them...
1. Do not post anything on the internet that would bring harm or embarrassment to someone else. The Biblical injunction for this is clear. "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you" (Matthew 7:12). "Do not let any unwholesome talk come out of your mouths, but only what is helpful for building others up according to their needs" (Ephesians 4:29).
2. Post things that have something to say. The idea here is to elevate the level of discussion. Too much trash enters the mind through the internet. Don't be a distributor of trash. Paul reminds us in Philippians 4:8 to think on things that are "lovely," excellent," "true," "noble" and "praiseworthy." Our minds and our posts ought to reflect the same standard.
These are two basic rules that a little OCS class in the small town of Union, MO agreed would help. I know it is a bit like "tilting at windmills," but to erase cruelty one person at a time might help. I hope you think about it. In Room 6 of the SRC, we will.
Thanks for reading...
Tuesday, October 5, 2010
What Makes A Difference
Have you ever felt like your relationship with Jesus Christ was stale? I have heard a lot of talk about people just "going through the motions." I understand that. There have been times in the last year that I have wondered whether or not I heard the Lord's call or if I have "plateaued" in my faith. Many Christian writers and singers have addressed the issue of growing cold or stale. I think the popular term for that today is "lukewarm" from the book of Revelation. There are books, songs and sermons that try to ignite faith and consume spiritual malaise. For my money, the best I have come across is Ted Dekker's new book Immanuel's Veins. I have been a fan of Ted Dekker for a while and enjoy many of his books. This one, though, went deeper than just enjoyment. This powerful story spoke of that which can really deepen faith and spur growth. It is a story about sacrificial love.
I do not want to spoil the story for those who may yet read it and I hope that there are many that do. I will simply say that this fictional account reminded me of what matters. The story is set in 1772 and reads as if it were an historical account. Toma Nicolescu is a decorated soldier in the service of Catherine the Great. He is sent to the base of the Carpathian Mountains in Moldavia to guard a mother and two daughters. Of course, it is not that simple. In Dekker's own unique style a story of intrigue, suspense and surprising chills leads to a profound spiritual message. What makes a difference is sacrificial love.
What did that story mean to me and what can it mean to you? First, let me define "sacrificial love." It is the kind of love that the Greek word "agape" describes. It is the love that is willing to do whatever it takes to make a difference, without regard for what it may or may not receive in return.
Seeing "sacrificial love" reminded me that if I am in the spiritual doldrums or bored with my walk, my focus must change. If I love sacrificially, then I am seeing the world through the eyes and needs of others. It is the kind of love that took Jesus to the cross. It is the kind of love John spoke of when he said, "Greater love has no man than this, that he lay down his life for his friends." If I begin to see the world through the eyes of those around me, it becomes a different picture. I become less concerned for how I am being treated and more aware of how others are feeling and what they perceive. If I am to be more like Christ, it will not be because I "will" myself to do it. Being shamed into changing my behavior can make a difference, but it won't likely last as long. I am convinced that real change will happen because I begin to love as he did; sacrificially. Loving in that way makes me a different person.
"Sacrificial love" also drives me to act upon my love. If I love "sacrificially," I am compelled to act. I think this is what James was thinking of when he wrote about faith being dead without works. To really love as Jesus did drives me to do something. Jesus, himself, set the example. He loved us enough to endure the shame and agony of the cross. His love was defined by his incredible action at Golgotha. "Sacrificial love" needs to be what motivates me, too. I reach out to others, not because I have to or I feel an obligation, but because that's just love. I see someone with a problem or a need and I act to the best of my ability. I may give up some or all of my possessions depending upon the situation. I seek opportunities to enrich someone else's life. If and when I begin to love sacrificially, then I will experience the joy and peace that comes from really loving.
Finally, I think "sacrificial love" identifies me with Jesus Christ. If I claim the name of "Christian," which I do, then I have a responsibility to be more like him. There are many ways in which I can attempt this, but I am discovering the best might be to simply receive the amazing love he has for me and love others that way as well. Kimber Lane, a bright, Godly young lady who I like to call "my kid," has a blog entitled "Love wins." I like that very much. I think that's the message of the cross. I think that's the message that this world needs today. "Love wins." If I am to be more like Christ, let me drink deeply from the "fountain filled with blood, drawn from Immanuel's veins." I know that "Sinners plunged beneath that flood lose all their guilty stains." Love wins.
Thanks for reading...
I do not want to spoil the story for those who may yet read it and I hope that there are many that do. I will simply say that this fictional account reminded me of what matters. The story is set in 1772 and reads as if it were an historical account. Toma Nicolescu is a decorated soldier in the service of Catherine the Great. He is sent to the base of the Carpathian Mountains in Moldavia to guard a mother and two daughters. Of course, it is not that simple. In Dekker's own unique style a story of intrigue, suspense and surprising chills leads to a profound spiritual message. What makes a difference is sacrificial love.
What did that story mean to me and what can it mean to you? First, let me define "sacrificial love." It is the kind of love that the Greek word "agape" describes. It is the love that is willing to do whatever it takes to make a difference, without regard for what it may or may not receive in return.
Seeing "sacrificial love" reminded me that if I am in the spiritual doldrums or bored with my walk, my focus must change. If I love sacrificially, then I am seeing the world through the eyes and needs of others. It is the kind of love that took Jesus to the cross. It is the kind of love John spoke of when he said, "Greater love has no man than this, that he lay down his life for his friends." If I begin to see the world through the eyes of those around me, it becomes a different picture. I become less concerned for how I am being treated and more aware of how others are feeling and what they perceive. If I am to be more like Christ, it will not be because I "will" myself to do it. Being shamed into changing my behavior can make a difference, but it won't likely last as long. I am convinced that real change will happen because I begin to love as he did; sacrificially. Loving in that way makes me a different person.
"Sacrificial love" also drives me to act upon my love. If I love "sacrificially," I am compelled to act. I think this is what James was thinking of when he wrote about faith being dead without works. To really love as Jesus did drives me to do something. Jesus, himself, set the example. He loved us enough to endure the shame and agony of the cross. His love was defined by his incredible action at Golgotha. "Sacrificial love" needs to be what motivates me, too. I reach out to others, not because I have to or I feel an obligation, but because that's just love. I see someone with a problem or a need and I act to the best of my ability. I may give up some or all of my possessions depending upon the situation. I seek opportunities to enrich someone else's life. If and when I begin to love sacrificially, then I will experience the joy and peace that comes from really loving.
Finally, I think "sacrificial love" identifies me with Jesus Christ. If I claim the name of "Christian," which I do, then I have a responsibility to be more like him. There are many ways in which I can attempt this, but I am discovering the best might be to simply receive the amazing love he has for me and love others that way as well. Kimber Lane, a bright, Godly young lady who I like to call "my kid," has a blog entitled "Love wins." I like that very much. I think that's the message of the cross. I think that's the message that this world needs today. "Love wins." If I am to be more like Christ, let me drink deeply from the "fountain filled with blood, drawn from Immanuel's veins." I know that "Sinners plunged beneath that flood lose all their guilty stains." Love wins.
Thanks for reading...
Thursday, September 16, 2010
Musings About Grace
John Newton, a former slave trader turned Christian, penned words that are still powerful and resonating today. "Amazing grace, how sweet the sound, that saved a wretch like me. I once was lost but now am found; was blind but now I see." I cannot read or write these words without seeing an older African-American lady in a nursing home in Kansas City where I used to live. I did a church service at that home and we often sang that great hymn. I can still see her; eyes closed, head back, voice clear and strong. I think Mrs. Stuckey has gone to be with the Lord now and I believe she still sings powerfully of his grace.
We sing a lot about grace and many books and lessons have been written about grace. It is a topic that all of us want to know, grasp and understand. After all, it is important. "For by grace you are saved through faith, not of yourselves; it is the gift of God so that no one can boast" (Ephesians 2:8). Ephesians 2:5 also notes that "by grace you are saved." The Greek word for grace is "charis" and is found over one hundred times in the New Testament. The Biblical writers pray for "grace and peace." Christians are told to let their conversations be "always with grace." Paul admonishes Christians to "grow in grace." Grace is mentioned a lot. The key question, as I see it, is what does it mean? What is "grace?"
A definition that I have heard often is that grace is "unmerited favor." I think that's a good definition, but it seems to lack some power or force. Grace may be better seen than defined. Grace is Barabbas' story. He deserved death. He was spared and set free. Grace is recognizing that you can't stack enough rocks to reach heaven. It means realizing that you don't have to DO anything to earn God's favor or love. You simply don't. You can't. Grace is getting it all, not because of what you did, but because of what he did.
Why is this important? I think there are some people who are still mired in the idea that they have to do something to gain God's approval. Of course, because we are saved by grace, we act. That's another blog for another day. For now, though, if you've worried that you haven't done enough for God to go to heaven; if you're concerned that someday God is going to send you to hell for what you didn't accomplish, this GRACE is for you. Receive it. Drink it in. Amazing grace...how sweet the sound.
Thanks for reading....
We sing a lot about grace and many books and lessons have been written about grace. It is a topic that all of us want to know, grasp and understand. After all, it is important. "For by grace you are saved through faith, not of yourselves; it is the gift of God so that no one can boast" (Ephesians 2:8). Ephesians 2:5 also notes that "by grace you are saved." The Greek word for grace is "charis" and is found over one hundred times in the New Testament. The Biblical writers pray for "grace and peace." Christians are told to let their conversations be "always with grace." Paul admonishes Christians to "grow in grace." Grace is mentioned a lot. The key question, as I see it, is what does it mean? What is "grace?"
A definition that I have heard often is that grace is "unmerited favor." I think that's a good definition, but it seems to lack some power or force. Grace may be better seen than defined. Grace is Barabbas' story. He deserved death. He was spared and set free. Grace is recognizing that you can't stack enough rocks to reach heaven. It means realizing that you don't have to DO anything to earn God's favor or love. You simply don't. You can't. Grace is getting it all, not because of what you did, but because of what he did.
Why is this important? I think there are some people who are still mired in the idea that they have to do something to gain God's approval. Of course, because we are saved by grace, we act. That's another blog for another day. For now, though, if you've worried that you haven't done enough for God to go to heaven; if you're concerned that someday God is going to send you to hell for what you didn't accomplish, this GRACE is for you. Receive it. Drink it in. Amazing grace...how sweet the sound.
Thanks for reading....
Political Musings
I have avoided the area of politics in this blog, not because I don't like it, but because I do not think that I have an opinion that is necessarily interesting or noteworthy. I think, though, I am going to break my vow not to write about it for this second blog today. I will write about it this time because I think what is happening politically is intersecting with spiritual things ( a topic far more intriguing for me).
There is a lot of discussion about the "Tea Party" and the influence it exerts on the electorate. Though not explicitly a Christian group, there are a lot of evangelical Christians invloved in this conservative movement. As I understand it, there is no "official" leader of the Tea Party, but the most notable national figures have been Glenn Beck and Sarah Palin. I want to give you this disclaimer before I go much further. I consider myself a conservative and a Christian. I am active politcally and even ran for local office in another life. Having established that, I want to say that I am bewildered and shocked at how Christians have embraced Beck and Palin. I have serious concerns with both.
Glenn Beck is an accomplished journalist and I agree with many of his ideas (though I find him a bit "over the top"). A few weeks ago, though, he led a march to Washington that was really a call for spiritual renewal. It was time for America to get back to God. I watched that rally and was impressed with what was said. It did seem that Beck was calling the nation back to God. It was like a Promise Keeper event in my mind. It was later that day that I discovered that Glenn Beck was/is a Mormon. Now, as far as that goes, he has a right to be what he chooses and there are a lot of good Mormon people. He could run for office or commentate on the news and be a Mormon as I see it. However, in my opinion, what he can't do is call the nation back to God and pray to God because his God and the God of Christianity isn't the same one. Beck doesn't seem to bother me as much as the hypocrisy of those on the right. Mitt Romney was rejected by many evangelicals because he was Mormon, but many of those same folks accept and endorse Beck. I just don't get it.
Sarah Palin is the "mama grizzly" for the Tea Party and its members. She has become a media star and political power. I voted for Palin and McCain in 2008 and I would consider voting for her again. However, my confidence in Palin has wobbled a bit lately. In this week's senate primary in Deleware she bucked the party leadership and backed Christine O'Donnell against veteran congressman Mike Castle. In doing this, she opposed Karl Rove, the architect of conservative victories in 2000 and 2004. Again, she has every right to do this and she should do as she sees fit. However, Palin bills herself as a Christian woman. She cites her faith readily and often in her book. I believe her. She knows Jesus Christ. To endorse O'Donnell, as I see it, violates that faith. O'Donnell has several issues for which she must give an answer. Some of them are in the area of character and values. There were/are areas of dishonesty and lying. I guess it is possible that Palin may not have known about all of these, but if she didn't, she should have. I find it hypocritical again for conservative Christians to stand for "the values of faith" and support candidates who so clearly fall short.
I am not sure that Christians mix very well in the arena of politics. I would be a fool (more than you already think) to deny that they are already in the same pot, however. What is a Christian to do? I think the same thing Micah 6:8 advocates. That's a good beginning.
Thanks for reading....
There is a lot of discussion about the "Tea Party" and the influence it exerts on the electorate. Though not explicitly a Christian group, there are a lot of evangelical Christians invloved in this conservative movement. As I understand it, there is no "official" leader of the Tea Party, but the most notable national figures have been Glenn Beck and Sarah Palin. I want to give you this disclaimer before I go much further. I consider myself a conservative and a Christian. I am active politcally and even ran for local office in another life. Having established that, I want to say that I am bewildered and shocked at how Christians have embraced Beck and Palin. I have serious concerns with both.
Glenn Beck is an accomplished journalist and I agree with many of his ideas (though I find him a bit "over the top"). A few weeks ago, though, he led a march to Washington that was really a call for spiritual renewal. It was time for America to get back to God. I watched that rally and was impressed with what was said. It did seem that Beck was calling the nation back to God. It was like a Promise Keeper event in my mind. It was later that day that I discovered that Glenn Beck was/is a Mormon. Now, as far as that goes, he has a right to be what he chooses and there are a lot of good Mormon people. He could run for office or commentate on the news and be a Mormon as I see it. However, in my opinion, what he can't do is call the nation back to God and pray to God because his God and the God of Christianity isn't the same one. Beck doesn't seem to bother me as much as the hypocrisy of those on the right. Mitt Romney was rejected by many evangelicals because he was Mormon, but many of those same folks accept and endorse Beck. I just don't get it.
Sarah Palin is the "mama grizzly" for the Tea Party and its members. She has become a media star and political power. I voted for Palin and McCain in 2008 and I would consider voting for her again. However, my confidence in Palin has wobbled a bit lately. In this week's senate primary in Deleware she bucked the party leadership and backed Christine O'Donnell against veteran congressman Mike Castle. In doing this, she opposed Karl Rove, the architect of conservative victories in 2000 and 2004. Again, she has every right to do this and she should do as she sees fit. However, Palin bills herself as a Christian woman. She cites her faith readily and often in her book. I believe her. She knows Jesus Christ. To endorse O'Donnell, as I see it, violates that faith. O'Donnell has several issues for which she must give an answer. Some of them are in the area of character and values. There were/are areas of dishonesty and lying. I guess it is possible that Palin may not have known about all of these, but if she didn't, she should have. I find it hypocritical again for conservative Christians to stand for "the values of faith" and support candidates who so clearly fall short.
I am not sure that Christians mix very well in the arena of politics. I would be a fool (more than you already think) to deny that they are already in the same pot, however. What is a Christian to do? I think the same thing Micah 6:8 advocates. That's a good beginning.
Thanks for reading....
Cotton Candy Dangers
"He has shown thee, O man, what is good and what the Lord requires of you; but to do justly and to love mercy and to walk humbly with your God" (Micah 6:8). I like that Old Testament verse (praise chorus, too, but that highlights my age and advancing years). In its context, the prophet is speaking of how he should come before the Lord on behalf of the wayward people. Burnt offerings, calves, rams and rivers of oil are not really adequate. What the Lord desires is a changed heart; one that does what is just, merciful and walks humbly with its Creator. The prophet in this text, I believe, is speaking of genuine faith as opposed to its common counterfeit, shallow or superficial faith.
I have heard and read quite a bit lately about a resurgence of spirituality. It seems to cut across geographic and denominational lines. I am always excited when people are motivated and inspired to live Godly lives and I hope to do that as well as I am able. My concern, you knew it was coming, is about what is motivating this renewal of spiritual passion.
I have been reading and have almost finished Sinclair Lewis' novel Elmer Gantry. I am sure that many of you have seen the movie with Burt Lancaster. It is a classic in American cinema. The concept of "Elmer Gantry" has been around since the novel and the movie. Whenever someone attracts a large crowd; is perceived not to have much substance; and is questioned about his/her motives; the label applied to them is "Elmer Gantry." I understand that. Certainly a large part of the book and all of the movie focuses on Elmer Gantry and his amazing ability and his dumbfounding hypocrisy. There is, though, in my opinion, a different message in this controversial novel. It is clear to me that Sinclair Lewis was an unbeliever who wrote this novel to ridicule and mock evangelical Christians of his day (possibly most directly Dwight L. Moody). It was interesting that Lewis did research for the book in Kansas City and set the fictional Bible College that Gantry attended in Kansas. The book, when it came out in the 1920's, generated much controversy and churches derided it from the beginning. As I read it now, nearly ninety years after it was penned, I am stunned by two things. First, Lewis does an amazing and painfully accurate job of describing the hypocritical and mean things that Christians do to each other and to the "non-Christian" world. He writes scathingly of hypocrisy, double-standards, stirring passion through emotion without any real substance, greed, indecency and just plain ugliness. It is obvious to me that he can't stand Christians (of that stripe anyway). I would dismiss it as the writing of an atheistic individual if there wasn't so much truth in it. I am convicned that many in the church today are being caught up in the same "show" that produced "Elmer Gantry." Second, Lewis misses what really ignites renewal and revival. It is never a part of the novel because, I think, Lewis never understood it. What is this "it?" Real change and the ability to live in it come from Jesus Christ. Lewis seems to view God and Jesus as creations of man to advance a scheme. He doesn't consider the possiblity that they may be real. As I see it, that's where we find the power to live effective Christian lives. Christians have, continue to, and will continue to do hypocritical things. Do not, though, measure Christ through the Christian. Though we fail from time to time, he remains what he is and the more that we are connected to him, the greater our chance of success.
I can hear you as you are reading, I get that. So what? Let me respond by sharing with you an observation. About a month ago I attended the Washington Fair and Fair Parade. It is a pretty big deal here in Franklin County. As I watched the floats go by, I noticed how the kids were excited for candy. One of the most popular treats on that hot, August day was cotton candy. It was pink or blue. It looked soft, fluffy and, well, delicious. No, I didn't eat any; I just looked at it. I thought about cotton candy again recently. Reading about Gantry's "stirring, emotional revivals" and about how the people were "carried away with him in the spirit" made me think of cotton candy. Gantry was excellent at stirring up the crowd and creating a moment of excitement, passion and ministry. Looking at what he actually said to the crowds, well, that was less than inspiring. For Gantry it wasn't what was said that mattered, but simply how it was said and what was generated from it. Cotton candy looks pretty and tastes sweet but it has no lasting nutritional value. I pray that the spiritual renewal that seems to have hit many people across the nation has substance to it. I pray that it is rooted in something deeper than emotion and passion. I pray that we, as a people, will return to Jesus Christ and become people of the book. In my opinion, that's when we'll be renewed.
Thanks for reading....
I have heard and read quite a bit lately about a resurgence of spirituality. It seems to cut across geographic and denominational lines. I am always excited when people are motivated and inspired to live Godly lives and I hope to do that as well as I am able. My concern, you knew it was coming, is about what is motivating this renewal of spiritual passion.
I have been reading and have almost finished Sinclair Lewis' novel Elmer Gantry. I am sure that many of you have seen the movie with Burt Lancaster. It is a classic in American cinema. The concept of "Elmer Gantry" has been around since the novel and the movie. Whenever someone attracts a large crowd; is perceived not to have much substance; and is questioned about his/her motives; the label applied to them is "Elmer Gantry." I understand that. Certainly a large part of the book and all of the movie focuses on Elmer Gantry and his amazing ability and his dumbfounding hypocrisy. There is, though, in my opinion, a different message in this controversial novel. It is clear to me that Sinclair Lewis was an unbeliever who wrote this novel to ridicule and mock evangelical Christians of his day (possibly most directly Dwight L. Moody). It was interesting that Lewis did research for the book in Kansas City and set the fictional Bible College that Gantry attended in Kansas. The book, when it came out in the 1920's, generated much controversy and churches derided it from the beginning. As I read it now, nearly ninety years after it was penned, I am stunned by two things. First, Lewis does an amazing and painfully accurate job of describing the hypocritical and mean things that Christians do to each other and to the "non-Christian" world. He writes scathingly of hypocrisy, double-standards, stirring passion through emotion without any real substance, greed, indecency and just plain ugliness. It is obvious to me that he can't stand Christians (of that stripe anyway). I would dismiss it as the writing of an atheistic individual if there wasn't so much truth in it. I am convicned that many in the church today are being caught up in the same "show" that produced "Elmer Gantry." Second, Lewis misses what really ignites renewal and revival. It is never a part of the novel because, I think, Lewis never understood it. What is this "it?" Real change and the ability to live in it come from Jesus Christ. Lewis seems to view God and Jesus as creations of man to advance a scheme. He doesn't consider the possiblity that they may be real. As I see it, that's where we find the power to live effective Christian lives. Christians have, continue to, and will continue to do hypocritical things. Do not, though, measure Christ through the Christian. Though we fail from time to time, he remains what he is and the more that we are connected to him, the greater our chance of success.
I can hear you as you are reading, I get that. So what? Let me respond by sharing with you an observation. About a month ago I attended the Washington Fair and Fair Parade. It is a pretty big deal here in Franklin County. As I watched the floats go by, I noticed how the kids were excited for candy. One of the most popular treats on that hot, August day was cotton candy. It was pink or blue. It looked soft, fluffy and, well, delicious. No, I didn't eat any; I just looked at it. I thought about cotton candy again recently. Reading about Gantry's "stirring, emotional revivals" and about how the people were "carried away with him in the spirit" made me think of cotton candy. Gantry was excellent at stirring up the crowd and creating a moment of excitement, passion and ministry. Looking at what he actually said to the crowds, well, that was less than inspiring. For Gantry it wasn't what was said that mattered, but simply how it was said and what was generated from it. Cotton candy looks pretty and tastes sweet but it has no lasting nutritional value. I pray that the spiritual renewal that seems to have hit many people across the nation has substance to it. I pray that it is rooted in something deeper than emotion and passion. I pray that we, as a people, will return to Jesus Christ and become people of the book. In my opinion, that's when we'll be renewed.
Thanks for reading....
Sunday, August 15, 2010
Men and Women of Honor
In the movie "Blindside" there is a part, near the end, where Michael Ohr is working on his English paper. He has to achieve a certain grade to pass and become eligilble to play football in college. He isn't sure what topic to select and he chooses a passage from "The Charge of the Light Brigade." The topic he selects is "honor." He is not so much interested in "courage" as he is "honor."
In the last few days I have thought about what professional atheltes conduct themselves with class. I have wondered about whether it is all right for Christians to use certain language or is that beneath them. I have tried to identify what it is for people to be respected and why it might be important. Is there any integrity among our leaders? Is there honesty in our media? As I rolled through these thoughts this morning before church, it occurred to me that there may be one all-encompassing trait, that if displayed, could make a big difference. That trait is honor.
What is honor? We hear songs about it: I am a man who will fight for your honor. I'll be the hero you've been dreaming of. (That song always brings to mind a date I had and a particular movie, a chick flick, I believe). We hear the word used in speeches: We've come to honor those who gave their lives..." It is found in the marriage vows: To Love, Honor and Cherish..." We hear a lot about it, but what is it?
Honor goes much deeper than courage and bravery. Courage and bravery inspire a person to do something challenging. Honor extends that to insure that the challenging task is really a task worth doing. Honor is more than integrity. Integrity, a good thing, is close to honesty and involves not only truth in words but in character. Honor pushes that one step further. It promotes truth is a manner that is kind and respectful. Honor is that quiet dignity one possesses when he/she is doing what is right and is not concerned with who will notice. Honor is that trait that motivates one to do what is right when it is costly and lonely.
I am convinced that honor is not really thought of very often today. How many people or things can we really call "honorable?"
How can we change that? The Bible gives some insight into how we can regain honor. Proverbs 15:33 notes that "humility comes before honor." The entire verse reads, "The fear of the Lord teaches a man wisdom and humility comes before honor." Solomon notes that a healthy respect of who God is and what he does is the first step in wisdom. He adds to that, if you want honor, then be humble. If we are going to recapture lost "honor," we begin by humbling ourselves before God and others. I am reminded of the movie "Raiders of the Lost Ark: The Last Crusade" and the scene in which they were entering the cave to find the holy grail. The clue said, "Only the penitent man can enter." Now, in the movie that meant that unless you were on your knees, you lost your head. I think there is truth there. Honorable people are humble people. Do not think more of yourself than you should. Do not seek to exalt yourself. Put others and their well-being ahead of your own. These are the marks of a humble spirit and the first steps toward honor. The Bible also tells us that whoever pays attention to correction gains honor. Proverbs 13:18 reads, "He who ignores discipline comes to poverty and shame, but whoever heeds correction is honored." If we are to live an "honorable" life, we must have a teachable and correctable spirit. That's a bit tough, isn't it? I don't know very many people who "like" being corrected. Most folks bristle at the thought and some reject it. A man or woman of honor realizes that he/she is still a work in progress and is open to and willing to change and correct.
Is honor a "lost cause" today? Should we just accept something a bit less as our standard? I don't think I want to answer that in words. I'd like it better to answer that in my actions. How about you? Think about it and, once again, thanks for reading....
In the last few days I have thought about what professional atheltes conduct themselves with class. I have wondered about whether it is all right for Christians to use certain language or is that beneath them. I have tried to identify what it is for people to be respected and why it might be important. Is there any integrity among our leaders? Is there honesty in our media? As I rolled through these thoughts this morning before church, it occurred to me that there may be one all-encompassing trait, that if displayed, could make a big difference. That trait is honor.
What is honor? We hear songs about it: I am a man who will fight for your honor. I'll be the hero you've been dreaming of. (That song always brings to mind a date I had and a particular movie, a chick flick, I believe). We hear the word used in speeches: We've come to honor those who gave their lives..." It is found in the marriage vows: To Love, Honor and Cherish..." We hear a lot about it, but what is it?
Honor goes much deeper than courage and bravery. Courage and bravery inspire a person to do something challenging. Honor extends that to insure that the challenging task is really a task worth doing. Honor is more than integrity. Integrity, a good thing, is close to honesty and involves not only truth in words but in character. Honor pushes that one step further. It promotes truth is a manner that is kind and respectful. Honor is that quiet dignity one possesses when he/she is doing what is right and is not concerned with who will notice. Honor is that trait that motivates one to do what is right when it is costly and lonely.
I am convinced that honor is not really thought of very often today. How many people or things can we really call "honorable?"
How can we change that? The Bible gives some insight into how we can regain honor. Proverbs 15:33 notes that "humility comes before honor." The entire verse reads, "The fear of the Lord teaches a man wisdom and humility comes before honor." Solomon notes that a healthy respect of who God is and what he does is the first step in wisdom. He adds to that, if you want honor, then be humble. If we are going to recapture lost "honor," we begin by humbling ourselves before God and others. I am reminded of the movie "Raiders of the Lost Ark: The Last Crusade" and the scene in which they were entering the cave to find the holy grail. The clue said, "Only the penitent man can enter." Now, in the movie that meant that unless you were on your knees, you lost your head. I think there is truth there. Honorable people are humble people. Do not think more of yourself than you should. Do not seek to exalt yourself. Put others and their well-being ahead of your own. These are the marks of a humble spirit and the first steps toward honor. The Bible also tells us that whoever pays attention to correction gains honor. Proverbs 13:18 reads, "He who ignores discipline comes to poverty and shame, but whoever heeds correction is honored." If we are to live an "honorable" life, we must have a teachable and correctable spirit. That's a bit tough, isn't it? I don't know very many people who "like" being corrected. Most folks bristle at the thought and some reject it. A man or woman of honor realizes that he/she is still a work in progress and is open to and willing to change and correct.
Is honor a "lost cause" today? Should we just accept something a bit less as our standard? I don't think I want to answer that in words. I'd like it better to answer that in my actions. How about you? Think about it and, once again, thanks for reading....
Monday, July 26, 2010
Theological thoughts...
Well, it has been a long time, huh? I am glad to write again. The topic of this post is "theological thoughts," but that sounds a bit more academic than I think this will end up being. I have been reading and hearing quite a bit lately about Bible studies and books that are challenging people and making them think and evaluate their walk with the Lord. I am encouraged by that and believe that to be an important and necessary thing.
I have, though, picked up a theme from a few different sources that struck a note with me. This isn't in "response" to any particular work or class, but a reaction to a perception. It seems to me that there are quite a few Christians (perhaps of the emergent variety, though certainly not limited to that) that seem to advocate a withdrawal from the things of the world to really pursue the things of Christ. I get the impression that the more one gives up of the things of the world, the greater his/her opportunity to grow spiritually. I read of one Christian leader who downsized his family's house because they simply didn't need that much house. I understand this thinking and I believe it has much merit. I am concerned a bit, though, about the logical end of that kind of thinking.
Jesus told one person, the rich young ruler (Matthew 19), to give all he had to the poor. I think it is important to note Biblically that he did not issue that statement to all who had "stuff," he issued that challenge to this man. He had other followers who had "stuff" (the women mentioned in Luke 8:1-3 for example). I make that observation because I think it is dangerous to make universal a particular challenge of Jesus. He does say, though, that it is hard for a rich man to enter the kingdom of heaven (Matthew 19:23). Notice he says, "hard" but not "impossible." Peter follows this statement of Jesus with the observation of how they (the apostles) had left all to follow him. Jesus replied that those who had left all will receive it again and even more in the coming kingdom.
What do we make of that? First, Jesus appears to be challenging the priority of the heart. He demands to be first. In the case of the rich ruler, there was some doubt with respect to what mattered most. There was no doubt in the case of the apostles. This seems to be a discusison more about priorities than it does about "stuff." Second, "stuff" can get in the way. It is not a surprise that Jesus spoke of money more than many other dangers and it is clear that "the love of money is the root of all kinds of evil" (1 Timothy 6:10). Notice, though, that it is the LOVE of money. Again, I believe Paul to be addressing, as Jesus did, a priority issue. Having made that case, I turn to why is this important and why did it make me come out of hiding to write again.
I think it is dangerous and a bit hypocritcal to denounce all things material. The truth, as I see it, is that we (the church) need people who are gifted and have the right priority to give generously and abundantly for the kingdom's sake. If we begin to nurture the perspective that "all things material" are bad, I think we do the kingdom a disservice. To be blunt...
Churches need believers who have the means to fund the mission trip to Haiti, Jamaica, Mexico, etc. Without those who generously give, those with the "heart to go" must sit and wait.
Ministries need believers who have the means to write the $5,000 check to fund the shortage in the program.
The body of Christ needs those who have a large home to be able to open it to the traveling youth group or mission family. I have downsized a bit recently and it would have to be a very small group to fit into where I now live.
The bottom line, as I see it, is that material things are just that: things. They are neither good nor bad. Things/money have a tempting nature that must be watched. For the kingdom work, though, in Jesus' time and our time, we need people who have that gift and ability to use the things they have for his sake. I guess I am appealing for a bit of balance. Thanks for reading and feel free to comment...
I have, though, picked up a theme from a few different sources that struck a note with me. This isn't in "response" to any particular work or class, but a reaction to a perception. It seems to me that there are quite a few Christians (perhaps of the emergent variety, though certainly not limited to that) that seem to advocate a withdrawal from the things of the world to really pursue the things of Christ. I get the impression that the more one gives up of the things of the world, the greater his/her opportunity to grow spiritually. I read of one Christian leader who downsized his family's house because they simply didn't need that much house. I understand this thinking and I believe it has much merit. I am concerned a bit, though, about the logical end of that kind of thinking.
Jesus told one person, the rich young ruler (Matthew 19), to give all he had to the poor. I think it is important to note Biblically that he did not issue that statement to all who had "stuff," he issued that challenge to this man. He had other followers who had "stuff" (the women mentioned in Luke 8:1-3 for example). I make that observation because I think it is dangerous to make universal a particular challenge of Jesus. He does say, though, that it is hard for a rich man to enter the kingdom of heaven (Matthew 19:23). Notice he says, "hard" but not "impossible." Peter follows this statement of Jesus with the observation of how they (the apostles) had left all to follow him. Jesus replied that those who had left all will receive it again and even more in the coming kingdom.
What do we make of that? First, Jesus appears to be challenging the priority of the heart. He demands to be first. In the case of the rich ruler, there was some doubt with respect to what mattered most. There was no doubt in the case of the apostles. This seems to be a discusison more about priorities than it does about "stuff." Second, "stuff" can get in the way. It is not a surprise that Jesus spoke of money more than many other dangers and it is clear that "the love of money is the root of all kinds of evil" (1 Timothy 6:10). Notice, though, that it is the LOVE of money. Again, I believe Paul to be addressing, as Jesus did, a priority issue. Having made that case, I turn to why is this important and why did it make me come out of hiding to write again.
I think it is dangerous and a bit hypocritcal to denounce all things material. The truth, as I see it, is that we (the church) need people who are gifted and have the right priority to give generously and abundantly for the kingdom's sake. If we begin to nurture the perspective that "all things material" are bad, I think we do the kingdom a disservice. To be blunt...
Churches need believers who have the means to fund the mission trip to Haiti, Jamaica, Mexico, etc. Without those who generously give, those with the "heart to go" must sit and wait.
Ministries need believers who have the means to write the $5,000 check to fund the shortage in the program.
The body of Christ needs those who have a large home to be able to open it to the traveling youth group or mission family. I have downsized a bit recently and it would have to be a very small group to fit into where I now live.
The bottom line, as I see it, is that material things are just that: things. They are neither good nor bad. Things/money have a tempting nature that must be watched. For the kingdom work, though, in Jesus' time and our time, we need people who have that gift and ability to use the things they have for his sake. I guess I am appealing for a bit of balance. Thanks for reading and feel free to comment...
Thursday, May 13, 2010
Laugh A Little
"Laughter is the best medecine." This is an old adage and the title of an Erma Bombeck book (my mother would be happy that I know that). I thought a bit about laughter in the last day or so. The students at UMS (Union Middle School where I work for all of you like Kimber Lane) believe that I am the emotionless man. I am always calm, never yell, and never laugh or smile. Now, I don't know if that is the case or not, but I like the reputation, so I try to keep it going. I find it humorous to be, well, un-humorous, if you catch what I'm trying to say.
There is a lot to be said for laughter. I know that some medical research has shown that laughter can help the healing process. Laughter is good for the mind and the soul according to many "experts" in the field. I was wondering as I was walking the streets of Washington tonight, did Jesus ever laugh? I tried to think of some scripture reference that would show that. There are a few OT references to God "laughing" but most of them are at his enemies. I didn't find a reference in which Jesus laughed. I don't think, though, that means he didn't. I think his exchange with the woman of Canaan whose daughter was demon-possessed might have brought a chuckle or two. He talks of being sent to the "lost sheep of Israel," but she worshipped and kept pleading. He talked of taking "children's bread and tossing it to the dogs" and she retorted that even the dogs get crumbs. I think this had to bring a smile to his face. There is another incident that I think has a humorous moment that is often overlooked. John 11 records the raising of Lazarus. His death is not really funny. In fact, Jesus wept. There is a moment, though, at which I think Jesus had to laugh. Jesus said, "Take away the stone." Martha said (as found in the KJV), "Lord, by this time he stinketh." Did you catch that? Stinketh! That's a funny word. I don't know how it sounds in Hebrew. I am sure Mark Hahlen does and can attest to whether or not it as funny in the original. Jesus had to laugh at this. I mean, he knows that and he knows what's coming next. "Thanks Martha, I appreciate your help." I don't know if he said it or thought it, but I can see it. Funny stuff.
Well, I know what you're thinking here. What's the point of all this? I guess it is simple. Laugh. Laugh a lot. To the surprise of many, I laugh. The movie that makes me laugh the most? "It's A Mad,Mad World." Funniest scene in a movie? My brothers were with me and it had to do with a trunk and a highway. Funniest group? Bible Bowl people. I have a lot funny stories with family, friends and Bible Bowlers. I think it is important to laugh. So, today, laugh a little. I don't think it will make your problems disappear, but it might lighten the load. Thanks again for reading...
There is a lot to be said for laughter. I know that some medical research has shown that laughter can help the healing process. Laughter is good for the mind and the soul according to many "experts" in the field. I was wondering as I was walking the streets of Washington tonight, did Jesus ever laugh? I tried to think of some scripture reference that would show that. There are a few OT references to God "laughing" but most of them are at his enemies. I didn't find a reference in which Jesus laughed. I don't think, though, that means he didn't. I think his exchange with the woman of Canaan whose daughter was demon-possessed might have brought a chuckle or two. He talks of being sent to the "lost sheep of Israel," but she worshipped and kept pleading. He talked of taking "children's bread and tossing it to the dogs" and she retorted that even the dogs get crumbs. I think this had to bring a smile to his face. There is another incident that I think has a humorous moment that is often overlooked. John 11 records the raising of Lazarus. His death is not really funny. In fact, Jesus wept. There is a moment, though, at which I think Jesus had to laugh. Jesus said, "Take away the stone." Martha said (as found in the KJV), "Lord, by this time he stinketh." Did you catch that? Stinketh! That's a funny word. I don't know how it sounds in Hebrew. I am sure Mark Hahlen does and can attest to whether or not it as funny in the original. Jesus had to laugh at this. I mean, he knows that and he knows what's coming next. "Thanks Martha, I appreciate your help." I don't know if he said it or thought it, but I can see it. Funny stuff.
Well, I know what you're thinking here. What's the point of all this? I guess it is simple. Laugh. Laugh a lot. To the surprise of many, I laugh. The movie that makes me laugh the most? "It's A Mad,Mad World." Funniest scene in a movie? My brothers were with me and it had to do with a trunk and a highway. Funniest group? Bible Bowl people. I have a lot funny stories with family, friends and Bible Bowlers. I think it is important to laugh. So, today, laugh a little. I don't think it will make your problems disappear, but it might lighten the load. Thanks again for reading...
Tuesday, March 16, 2010
It Will Be All Right
It has been a long time since I have posted, but that is due to a lack of time more than it is a lack of thought. I know that is hard to believe for some of you, but it is true. I do have a few minutes this morning, though, and thought I would try to get down what I believe God has been showing me in the last month or so.
Like many of you, I have been tuned in to what is going on in our nation. President Obama and the Democrats are attempting to pass a health care bill that is, at best, controversial. The Republicans and conservatives, naturally, oppose it. There has been a lot of turmoil in Washington D.C. The economy continues to drag and there is widespread concern about jobs and money. A few people I know are doing as well or better than ever, but most are just hanging in there, hoping things improve. On a personal level, I am still seeking what God will have me do next. Jobs in all areas are not a plentiful as I had hoped. It is an uncertain time. What is true for me is true for others, too. I know quite a few people who are facing tough times. I believe it is easy, in times like these, to lose sight of Jesus Christ.
Last Sunday night I was reading in the Psalms and came across Psalm 40. It is a psalm that David writes expressing his desire to do God's will. The whole psalm was refreshing to me, but the part that stood out the most was the first part of verse four. There David writes, "Blessed is the man who makes the Lord his trust..." That resonated with me. Through the winds of uncertainty and the storms of doubt, this verse is a call to trust. "Don't give up." "Don't waver." "Don't quit." I realize that I am not in control of my situation. I firmly believe that the Lord called me to this place. I am equally convinced that he will not abandon me. I hope that you can share that confidence, too. The Lord didn't bring about the hardship you face, but he can see you through it. Trust. The Lord didn't cause the illness, but he is the Great Physician. Trust.
The situations in which we find ourselves can cause anxiety and erode confidence. I think there are times when we can even forget that Jesus Christ is with us. I was also reading last night in Luke 24. The crucifixion has taken place and the apostles are in hiding. Disappointment hangs heavy in the air. Cleopas and another are walking to the village of Emmaus. The discussion is on what might have been. A stranger joins them and...you know the rest. They were so down that they didn't realize that Lord was right with them. I've read that before, but it took on new meaning for me recently. Jesus Christ is with me even when I struggle. He is there when I am tying to figure out my place in a new environment. He is always there. He is there for you, too. He is there when you are hurting. He is there when life stinks. He is there when life is good, too.
I am encouraged to look for Jesus and I hope you will be, too. Thanks for reading...
Like many of you, I have been tuned in to what is going on in our nation. President Obama and the Democrats are attempting to pass a health care bill that is, at best, controversial. The Republicans and conservatives, naturally, oppose it. There has been a lot of turmoil in Washington D.C. The economy continues to drag and there is widespread concern about jobs and money. A few people I know are doing as well or better than ever, but most are just hanging in there, hoping things improve. On a personal level, I am still seeking what God will have me do next. Jobs in all areas are not a plentiful as I had hoped. It is an uncertain time. What is true for me is true for others, too. I know quite a few people who are facing tough times. I believe it is easy, in times like these, to lose sight of Jesus Christ.
Last Sunday night I was reading in the Psalms and came across Psalm 40. It is a psalm that David writes expressing his desire to do God's will. The whole psalm was refreshing to me, but the part that stood out the most was the first part of verse four. There David writes, "Blessed is the man who makes the Lord his trust..." That resonated with me. Through the winds of uncertainty and the storms of doubt, this verse is a call to trust. "Don't give up." "Don't waver." "Don't quit." I realize that I am not in control of my situation. I firmly believe that the Lord called me to this place. I am equally convinced that he will not abandon me. I hope that you can share that confidence, too. The Lord didn't bring about the hardship you face, but he can see you through it. Trust. The Lord didn't cause the illness, but he is the Great Physician. Trust.
The situations in which we find ourselves can cause anxiety and erode confidence. I think there are times when we can even forget that Jesus Christ is with us. I was also reading last night in Luke 24. The crucifixion has taken place and the apostles are in hiding. Disappointment hangs heavy in the air. Cleopas and another are walking to the village of Emmaus. The discussion is on what might have been. A stranger joins them and...you know the rest. They were so down that they didn't realize that Lord was right with them. I've read that before, but it took on new meaning for me recently. Jesus Christ is with me even when I struggle. He is there when I am tying to figure out my place in a new environment. He is always there. He is there for you, too. He is there when you are hurting. He is there when life stinks. He is there when life is good, too.
I am encouraged to look for Jesus and I hope you will be, too. Thanks for reading...
Tuesday, February 9, 2010
The Importance of Faith
"Now faith is being sure of what we hope for and certain of what we do not see" (Hebrews 11:1). This passage is used a lot in evangelical circles to define "faith." Christians talk about "faith" a lot and we encourage people to have "faith" and to walk in "faith." Lately, though, I have been questioning what that means. Do we just say these words without really grasping the depth of it?
I have been studying, recently, "Progressive Christianity." I have some personal reasons for looking at it, and in the process I have learned a great deal about "liberal" Christianity and the "faith" they profess. It is disturbing to me to read message boards and blogs that deny the inerrancy of Scripture and the exclusivity of Jesus Christ. I am troubled by statements that speak of "making others aware of the god in them." The hard thing is, though, that they also speak of "faith." The push for Progressive Christians is to have faith in their own "god-ness" and "goodness." They push for a "faith" in self.
I do not agree with that. "Faith," without identifying the what or the whom in which it is placed, is at best, weak and at worst, dangerous. Followers of Jesus Christ must be more specific as to where our faith lies. I am aware of a lot of circumstances and hardships that people are facing. Some I know are facing sickness. Others have family struggles. Some are wondering whether God has abandoned them. I am concerned for many at the church I used to serve. There seems to be a spirit of gloom and discouragment surrounding them. In my own life, I am not sure where God is going to lead. If there has ever been a time for "faith," it is now. I want to go further, though. What we need is faith in the person and work of Jesus Christ.
I am not smart enough or clever or enough to figure out what is best for my life. I do not know what to say to others. I want and pray for things to work out well for all those I know who are hurting and struggling. The key will be for me to entrust all of them (all of the issues, problems, heartaches) to the one person who is capable of handling all of them. My faith is not a blind faith that somehow, someday things will work out. My faith is in the person of Jesus Christ who has promised to never leave or forsake. My faith is in him of whom it is said, "and we know that in all things God works for the good of those who love him, who have been called according to his purpose" (Romans 8:28).
I will give him all of those who are hurting. I will give him all of those who feel lost. I will give him all of those who don't know what comes next. I will trust that he will work. He will provide. He will take care.
"Faith is the victory that overcomes the world." That's a line from an old hymn. Faith in the person of Jesus Christ is our victory. Let us truly be a people of faith. Thanks for reading....
I have been studying, recently, "Progressive Christianity." I have some personal reasons for looking at it, and in the process I have learned a great deal about "liberal" Christianity and the "faith" they profess. It is disturbing to me to read message boards and blogs that deny the inerrancy of Scripture and the exclusivity of Jesus Christ. I am troubled by statements that speak of "making others aware of the god in them." The hard thing is, though, that they also speak of "faith." The push for Progressive Christians is to have faith in their own "god-ness" and "goodness." They push for a "faith" in self.
I do not agree with that. "Faith," without identifying the what or the whom in which it is placed, is at best, weak and at worst, dangerous. Followers of Jesus Christ must be more specific as to where our faith lies. I am aware of a lot of circumstances and hardships that people are facing. Some I know are facing sickness. Others have family struggles. Some are wondering whether God has abandoned them. I am concerned for many at the church I used to serve. There seems to be a spirit of gloom and discouragment surrounding them. In my own life, I am not sure where God is going to lead. If there has ever been a time for "faith," it is now. I want to go further, though. What we need is faith in the person and work of Jesus Christ.
I am not smart enough or clever or enough to figure out what is best for my life. I do not know what to say to others. I want and pray for things to work out well for all those I know who are hurting and struggling. The key will be for me to entrust all of them (all of the issues, problems, heartaches) to the one person who is capable of handling all of them. My faith is not a blind faith that somehow, someday things will work out. My faith is in the person of Jesus Christ who has promised to never leave or forsake. My faith is in him of whom it is said, "and we know that in all things God works for the good of those who love him, who have been called according to his purpose" (Romans 8:28).
I will give him all of those who are hurting. I will give him all of those who feel lost. I will give him all of those who don't know what comes next. I will trust that he will work. He will provide. He will take care.
"Faith is the victory that overcomes the world." That's a line from an old hymn. Faith in the person of Jesus Christ is our victory. Let us truly be a people of faith. Thanks for reading....
Sunday, January 31, 2010
God's Goodness
As I am writing today, cold germs are ravaging my body. My joints ache and my head is stuffy. How is that for descriptive writing, huh? I seriously do have a cold and am hoping to shake it by tomorrow, at least to some degree. As I have been in my apartment today, I have had a lot of time to think (between sleeping times). My thoughts have been directed toward one idea today, God is good. I know that is hardly a revolutionary concept, but I think it is a significant one.
There are a lot of people going through hard times. I pay attention to the political scene and I have heard that unemployment is at 10% nationwide. Staggering! However, in a more personal way, I just got an email from a friend letting me know that his job/ministry was dropped due to budget cuts at the church. He and his family are seeking the Lord in this matter. That's not just a statistic, that's a real person that I know. Tough times, for sure. I know, in my own search for the Lord's will for my life, that the places that I apply often have fifty to seventy-five resumes from which to choose. Tough times. Hard times are not just limited to the job market. I am aware of a family that just lost a dear loved one. I know of another who is facing a battery of demanding physical tests as they battle illness. Sometimes the prognosis isn't what we want to hear. Tough times.
In the middle of all of these struggles, I have been reminded that God is there and that he cares. Matthew noted Jesus' words how God cares for the birds, surely he will care for you. We know that God is faithful and that he is love (1 John 4:7-8). How have I seen his caring hand, you ask?
It shows up in the simplest of things, really. The answer to a small prayer that doesn't mean much to anyone outside of me. But it mattered to me and it mattered to God.
It is in the quiet confidence that even though I don't know what the future holds, he does and that's ok. I surely do wish things would be a certain way. When things aren't going that way, it leads to uncertainty and instability. These two are "joy robbers" and deprive us all of what can be ours. When I feel that way, and I do, I am reminded that He is in charge. I do believe all things will work togehter for good. I do believe.
It is in the consistency of routines. That sounds a bit odd, doesn't it? Let me explain. As I go about my daily life, doing what it is that God has placed before me that day, I do not have much time to worry or be overcome by tomorrow. The discipline of serving him every hour shows me his hand and lets me know it will be all right.
That's it, isn't it? We want things to be "all right." Whenever I hear those words, I think back to Mitchell. Do you remember him? He is the special needs child I met last September. I saw him at lunch last week. He doesn't have a wide vocabularly (outside of a few cuss words), but one thing I do remember well is him saying, "It's all right." Hmmm... Mitchell says things are all right. I believe that, too, Mitchell. Thanks for reading and look for God's hand. I believe you'll find it.
There are a lot of people going through hard times. I pay attention to the political scene and I have heard that unemployment is at 10% nationwide. Staggering! However, in a more personal way, I just got an email from a friend letting me know that his job/ministry was dropped due to budget cuts at the church. He and his family are seeking the Lord in this matter. That's not just a statistic, that's a real person that I know. Tough times, for sure. I know, in my own search for the Lord's will for my life, that the places that I apply often have fifty to seventy-five resumes from which to choose. Tough times. Hard times are not just limited to the job market. I am aware of a family that just lost a dear loved one. I know of another who is facing a battery of demanding physical tests as they battle illness. Sometimes the prognosis isn't what we want to hear. Tough times.
In the middle of all of these struggles, I have been reminded that God is there and that he cares. Matthew noted Jesus' words how God cares for the birds, surely he will care for you. We know that God is faithful and that he is love (1 John 4:7-8). How have I seen his caring hand, you ask?
It shows up in the simplest of things, really. The answer to a small prayer that doesn't mean much to anyone outside of me. But it mattered to me and it mattered to God.
It is in the quiet confidence that even though I don't know what the future holds, he does and that's ok. I surely do wish things would be a certain way. When things aren't going that way, it leads to uncertainty and instability. These two are "joy robbers" and deprive us all of what can be ours. When I feel that way, and I do, I am reminded that He is in charge. I do believe all things will work togehter for good. I do believe.
It is in the consistency of routines. That sounds a bit odd, doesn't it? Let me explain. As I go about my daily life, doing what it is that God has placed before me that day, I do not have much time to worry or be overcome by tomorrow. The discipline of serving him every hour shows me his hand and lets me know it will be all right.
That's it, isn't it? We want things to be "all right." Whenever I hear those words, I think back to Mitchell. Do you remember him? He is the special needs child I met last September. I saw him at lunch last week. He doesn't have a wide vocabularly (outside of a few cuss words), but one thing I do remember well is him saying, "It's all right." Hmmm... Mitchell says things are all right. I believe that, too, Mitchell. Thanks for reading and look for God's hand. I believe you'll find it.
Monday, January 18, 2010
Movie Inspires High View of the Bible
This weekend I had the opportunity to see the movie "The Book of Eli" starring Denzel Washington. Now I know, for many of you, that fact that Denzel Washington is in the movie is reason enough to see it. This movie, though, ought to have an even greater pull for Christians. The message of this movie, in my opinion, is clear. The Bible matters. I won't get into the details of the movie because I don't want to spoil it for those who may yet see it. I will, though, address one topic that I think resonates from this Hollywood offering: Bible memorization.
Psalm 119:11 says, "I have hidden your word in my heart that I might not sin against you." The Lord told Joshua as he began to lead the people of Israel, "Do not let this Book of the Law depart from your mouth; meditate on it day and night, so that you may be careful to do everything written in it. Then you will be prosperous and successful" (Joshua 1:9). Both of these verses and countless others indicate the importance of really knowing Scripture.
As I watched the movie, "The Book of Eli," I wondered how much of the Bible do I really know? How much can I quote of it? As I ask these questions, I am humbled. I have read through the whole Bible. I can give, I think, a summary of what each book contains. How much of it have I really internalized? Not as much as I would have liked or should have. I realize that Bible memorization isn't stressed as much as it used to be. Camp used to give prizes for Bible memory. Sunday School classes used to give a memory verse every week. Bible Bowl used to have 3,000 or so young people involved around the nation. Some camp deans still may push Bible memory, but I know a lot that don't. Some Sunday School teachers may still give a memory verse, but I know of many that do not. Bible Bowl is still a great program, but only half as many kids are involved. Why is this the case?
Let me suggest a few reasons. First, there is an educational bias against rote memory. Back when I was in school, (I just love being old enough to really say that), when I had a course on Shakespeare, we had to memorize parts of the play and really know the play. Today, that same course tests, not on what is in the play, but more on what the play means and how the student relates to the play. Now let me say I don't think it is bad to be able to demonstrate those skills. In fact, I think it is good. However, I do need to ask, how can one really relate to something he or she doesn't know? Second, there is a church bias against Bible memory, too. That sounds strange, doesn't it? I believe there is, though. How many people bring their own Bibles to church? How many times do Christians want to apply the Scripture without ever really knowing the Scripture? Again, I ask, how can you apply that which you do not know?
If we really believe the Bible to be the inspired word of God, then it takes on an even greater importance. It is not some history book that you can really learn. It is actually the "God-breated" message for lost man. The words of Scripture matter. They give hope. They give comfort. They challenge and convict. They point to Jesus Christ!
I want to issue a challenge to the ( I wanted to say millions at this point, then I thought thousands, nope. Hundreds, not really. Fifties, no.) teens that read these posts to memorize a portion of Scripture today. I won't just leave you with the challenge, though. I will give you a tool. In Bible Bowl, I call this the "Quote Book." Here it is.
Take 2 Timothy 1:1. Write down: P,A A O C J B T W O G, A T T P O L T I I C J.
These are the first letters of every word in the verse that says, "Paul, an apostle of Christ Jesus by the will of God, according to the promise of life that is in Christ Jesus." I typed that without looking at the Bible. I only used the first letters. By studying and going over the verses using these letters, I can memorize large portions of the Bible. My Bible Bowl kids have for years. So, to the teens of you out there, take my challenge. I am going to try to memorize more, too. Thanks for reading and, if you get the chance, see the movie. Prepare to be humbled.
Psalm 119:11 says, "I have hidden your word in my heart that I might not sin against you." The Lord told Joshua as he began to lead the people of Israel, "Do not let this Book of the Law depart from your mouth; meditate on it day and night, so that you may be careful to do everything written in it. Then you will be prosperous and successful" (Joshua 1:9). Both of these verses and countless others indicate the importance of really knowing Scripture.
As I watched the movie, "The Book of Eli," I wondered how much of the Bible do I really know? How much can I quote of it? As I ask these questions, I am humbled. I have read through the whole Bible. I can give, I think, a summary of what each book contains. How much of it have I really internalized? Not as much as I would have liked or should have. I realize that Bible memorization isn't stressed as much as it used to be. Camp used to give prizes for Bible memory. Sunday School classes used to give a memory verse every week. Bible Bowl used to have 3,000 or so young people involved around the nation. Some camp deans still may push Bible memory, but I know a lot that don't. Some Sunday School teachers may still give a memory verse, but I know of many that do not. Bible Bowl is still a great program, but only half as many kids are involved. Why is this the case?
Let me suggest a few reasons. First, there is an educational bias against rote memory. Back when I was in school, (I just love being old enough to really say that), when I had a course on Shakespeare, we had to memorize parts of the play and really know the play. Today, that same course tests, not on what is in the play, but more on what the play means and how the student relates to the play. Now let me say I don't think it is bad to be able to demonstrate those skills. In fact, I think it is good. However, I do need to ask, how can one really relate to something he or she doesn't know? Second, there is a church bias against Bible memory, too. That sounds strange, doesn't it? I believe there is, though. How many people bring their own Bibles to church? How many times do Christians want to apply the Scripture without ever really knowing the Scripture? Again, I ask, how can you apply that which you do not know?
If we really believe the Bible to be the inspired word of God, then it takes on an even greater importance. It is not some history book that you can really learn. It is actually the "God-breated" message for lost man. The words of Scripture matter. They give hope. They give comfort. They challenge and convict. They point to Jesus Christ!
I want to issue a challenge to the ( I wanted to say millions at this point, then I thought thousands, nope. Hundreds, not really. Fifties, no.) teens that read these posts to memorize a portion of Scripture today. I won't just leave you with the challenge, though. I will give you a tool. In Bible Bowl, I call this the "Quote Book." Here it is.
Take 2 Timothy 1:1. Write down: P,A A O C J B T W O G, A T T P O L T I I C J.
These are the first letters of every word in the verse that says, "Paul, an apostle of Christ Jesus by the will of God, according to the promise of life that is in Christ Jesus." I typed that without looking at the Bible. I only used the first letters. By studying and going over the verses using these letters, I can memorize large portions of the Bible. My Bible Bowl kids have for years. So, to the teens of you out there, take my challenge. I am going to try to memorize more, too. Thanks for reading and, if you get the chance, see the movie. Prepare to be humbled.
Friday, January 8, 2010
Additional Bible Bowl Musings
I am off school again today and had a few more idle thoughts regarding Bible Bowl days gone by. This is mostly for old Stony Point players....
My most memorable games as a coach: (Not in any order but by year)
1988 vs. Lawrence/Oaklandon I was the new SP coach after Mike Wileman left at Easter that year. We won the game on the last question and went on to finish 4th. Tough act to follow in following Mike. That game helped immensely. Delaine, Dan, Melissa, Clint, and Roger led this team.
1989 vs. SE Englewood This was a round 10 game, both teams were undefeated and SE Englewood had been 1st and 2nd the two previous years. Our kids "back in black" won big and that propelled them to a 2nd place finish. Dan, Melissa, Melanie, Roger, Wendy, Mike and Clint led the way in Louisville.
1990 vs. Creve Couer This was a round 11 game that if you won, you went on to the top 8. This was the famous "precious stones" game in which Mike Golden got his only question of that national tournament. The game came down to that contention and I still remember Melanie Way (Edwards now) praying at the table. That team, Melanie, Wendy, Mike and Roger went on to finish 5th.
1994 vs. Ben Davis in R 11. This was an all new team. Abby Morton a junior played with a freshman, an 8th grader and a 7th grader.(Chris, Kevin and Clint) In this game, the team came back to beat the team that put us in the losers' bracket. This win, by a good margin, put us in the top 8. This is also the only game I remember Bret Talley quizzing my team.
1995 a host of games could qualify in this National Championship year. The most memorable, though, was a round 12 game vs. Traders Point. They were the 3rd place team the year before and the home town team. We won the game handily and moved on. Clint, Kevin, Chris, Matt and Rachel had accomplished a lot in Indy that week. This tournament was the first one ever with BBERT. Man were those questions clean, good and fast!
1997 Once again, the most memorable was a win vs. Traders Point in round 8. Erin, Rachel, David and Keith made up this team. This was the first year that the top 16 was recognized and that upset win gave us a top 12 finish. Three use words first showed up here at this national tournament.
1999 The most memorable game here was the round 9 game vs. SE Englewood. Ron Russell coached this team. The SP team, Rachel, Candace, Megan, and Keith had rebounded from a round 4 loss to win four in a row. This game meant top 16 or not. It was a good win against a good team.
2000 This year had a host of memorable games, too. I think the most memorable, though, came against the number three overall seed Madeira. David Underwood yawned his way through this one and Keith Golubski even got one. Candace Golubski and Christy Saunders rounded out this team that went all the way to 10th in the nation.
2001 Candace and Christy were back again and with them were the Bolejacks' (Emily and Parker). The most memorable game of this year is one I didn't see. It was a round 7 tie-breaker that Jim Hurley of Rising Sun bounced to us. That propelled us into the top 16. This was the first year that Question Type Headers were used. Took a while to get used to that. This was also the first year we placed in the team average, finishing 5th.
2005 This year we hit the trifecta for the first time. Beginner Bowl, Jr. Bible Bowl and Bible Bowl all placed at Nationals. The most memorable game for me in this one was the Bible Bowl team's win against Maineville after losing on the last question to Cornerstone. That game began Josiah Gorman's career in the top level of Bible Bowl. Gorman, Alex, Joel and Esther made up that team which also took 5th on the test team average.
2006 Another memorable year. The run to the national championshiop was marked with lots of good stuff. We had the trifecta again with Beginner Bowl, Jr. Bible Bowl and Bible Bowl all placing. We also won the team average for the first time nationally. Most memorable game: a round 8 5 point win over River Valley that began that last morning. Josiah, Joel, Kimber, Kate, Brandon and Alex made up this team.
2007 Hard to follow a championship year but I think we did ok. Had our best summer ever as far as wins at major tournaments. We finished 3rd at the Nationals in KC. We were able to capture our second team average in a row. Most memorable game: This time it is a loss. Our 5 point loss to Kissimmee in round 12 when we outbuzzed them 10-9 still sticks out as the time when Bordelon outcoached me. That's how it goes sometimes, though. A five point win can propel but a five point loss can deflate. Gorman, Kimber, Danielle, Kate, and Brandon made up this team.
2008 Most thought it to be a rebuilding year. Not so much, though. Kimber Lane was back from 06 and 07. Courtney Jones and Vin Alonzo joined her. We had a good season and a strong national tournament finishing 11th. Most memorable game? The round 6 win vs. Worthington. Team took 2nd in Test Average that year, too.
2009 An amazing year and my last at SP. Had a good summer but an excellent National tournament. Ran all the way to 3rd place. Lots of good games but the most memorable: Three of them. The first Austin game and the Towne South game stand out as our best performances. The second Austin game I didn't see but we came back to get the last five to win and that has to be memorable. Solid test average again:
5th.
2010 ?????
My most memorable games as a coach: (Not in any order but by year)
1988 vs. Lawrence/Oaklandon I was the new SP coach after Mike Wileman left at Easter that year. We won the game on the last question and went on to finish 4th. Tough act to follow in following Mike. That game helped immensely. Delaine, Dan, Melissa, Clint, and Roger led this team.
1989 vs. SE Englewood This was a round 10 game, both teams were undefeated and SE Englewood had been 1st and 2nd the two previous years. Our kids "back in black" won big and that propelled them to a 2nd place finish. Dan, Melissa, Melanie, Roger, Wendy, Mike and Clint led the way in Louisville.
1990 vs. Creve Couer This was a round 11 game that if you won, you went on to the top 8. This was the famous "precious stones" game in which Mike Golden got his only question of that national tournament. The game came down to that contention and I still remember Melanie Way (Edwards now) praying at the table. That team, Melanie, Wendy, Mike and Roger went on to finish 5th.
1994 vs. Ben Davis in R 11. This was an all new team. Abby Morton a junior played with a freshman, an 8th grader and a 7th grader.(Chris, Kevin and Clint) In this game, the team came back to beat the team that put us in the losers' bracket. This win, by a good margin, put us in the top 8. This is also the only game I remember Bret Talley quizzing my team.
1995 a host of games could qualify in this National Championship year. The most memorable, though, was a round 12 game vs. Traders Point. They were the 3rd place team the year before and the home town team. We won the game handily and moved on. Clint, Kevin, Chris, Matt and Rachel had accomplished a lot in Indy that week. This tournament was the first one ever with BBERT. Man were those questions clean, good and fast!
1997 Once again, the most memorable was a win vs. Traders Point in round 8. Erin, Rachel, David and Keith made up this team. This was the first year that the top 16 was recognized and that upset win gave us a top 12 finish. Three use words first showed up here at this national tournament.
1999 The most memorable game here was the round 9 game vs. SE Englewood. Ron Russell coached this team. The SP team, Rachel, Candace, Megan, and Keith had rebounded from a round 4 loss to win four in a row. This game meant top 16 or not. It was a good win against a good team.
2000 This year had a host of memorable games, too. I think the most memorable, though, came against the number three overall seed Madeira. David Underwood yawned his way through this one and Keith Golubski even got one. Candace Golubski and Christy Saunders rounded out this team that went all the way to 10th in the nation.
2001 Candace and Christy were back again and with them were the Bolejacks' (Emily and Parker). The most memorable game of this year is one I didn't see. It was a round 7 tie-breaker that Jim Hurley of Rising Sun bounced to us. That propelled us into the top 16. This was the first year that Question Type Headers were used. Took a while to get used to that. This was also the first year we placed in the team average, finishing 5th.
2005 This year we hit the trifecta for the first time. Beginner Bowl, Jr. Bible Bowl and Bible Bowl all placed at Nationals. The most memorable game for me in this one was the Bible Bowl team's win against Maineville after losing on the last question to Cornerstone. That game began Josiah Gorman's career in the top level of Bible Bowl. Gorman, Alex, Joel and Esther made up that team which also took 5th on the test team average.
2006 Another memorable year. The run to the national championshiop was marked with lots of good stuff. We had the trifecta again with Beginner Bowl, Jr. Bible Bowl and Bible Bowl all placing. We also won the team average for the first time nationally. Most memorable game: a round 8 5 point win over River Valley that began that last morning. Josiah, Joel, Kimber, Kate, Brandon and Alex made up this team.
2007 Hard to follow a championship year but I think we did ok. Had our best summer ever as far as wins at major tournaments. We finished 3rd at the Nationals in KC. We were able to capture our second team average in a row. Most memorable game: This time it is a loss. Our 5 point loss to Kissimmee in round 12 when we outbuzzed them 10-9 still sticks out as the time when Bordelon outcoached me. That's how it goes sometimes, though. A five point win can propel but a five point loss can deflate. Gorman, Kimber, Danielle, Kate, and Brandon made up this team.
2008 Most thought it to be a rebuilding year. Not so much, though. Kimber Lane was back from 06 and 07. Courtney Jones and Vin Alonzo joined her. We had a good season and a strong national tournament finishing 11th. Most memorable game? The round 6 win vs. Worthington. Team took 2nd in Test Average that year, too.
2009 An amazing year and my last at SP. Had a good summer but an excellent National tournament. Ran all the way to 3rd place. Lots of good games but the most memorable: Three of them. The first Austin game and the Towne South game stand out as our best performances. The second Austin game I didn't see but we came back to get the last five to win and that has to be memorable. Solid test average again:
5th.
2010 ?????
Thursday, January 7, 2010
Bible Bowl Musings
I just finished the blog on the importance of the Bible. I really do believe that. I am convinced that what matters (in connection with one's view of Jesus) is one's view of the Bible. Is it really God's Word or is it just another religious book? I believe the first. To quote the song I learned a long time ago, "The BIBLE. Yes that's the book for me. I stand alone on the Word of God; the BIBLE." Because of that love for God's Word and a bit of a competitive nature, I have been blessed by a program called Bible Bowl. Most of you know that I have been involved in Bible Bowl for almost 32 years. I played for six years. I was an assistant coach for about 2 years and I have been a head coach for 24 years this year (though technically I am not the "head coach" this year). That's a long time. In that time I have been privileged to study the entire New Testament and over one half of the Old Testament in depth. What I have memorized, I generally learned in Bible Bowl. I truly believe in this program and it has changed my life. I am concerned about the shrinking numbers of kids in Bible Bowl and will address that in a later post. What I want to do now is just share a few memories. I read a Joe Posnanski blog like this today and I was inspired. So, here goes...
My Favorite Cities for National Tournaments (in no particular order)
Indianapolis, IN
Louisville, KY
Cincinnati, OH
Tampa, FL
Chicago, IL
Least Favorite Cities for National Tournaments
St. Louis, MO
Dallas, TX
Best Comebacks I have ever seen in a game:
SE Louisville vs. College Hts in 1994 placement game in Orlando
College Hts got ten of eleven in the first half, SE L got the last nine and won by just a few points as I remember it.
Stony Point vs. Malvern in 2000 Lincoln Double Elim
SP got 6 of last 7 to win by 15 points against Rene Miller. Later, at JBC, Malvern got revenge.
Stony Point vs Austin in 2009 National tournament to get to the Final Four. (Sorry Ruth) SP trailed by 195 with five questions left. Needing all five and all bonus points, SP got them and won by five.
Best Game Ever...
Malvern vs. Kissimmee in 2005 National Top 12 Winner's bracket game. Both teams tied at 400 at the end of regulation. All questions and bonus answered correctly and evenly. Kissimmee won on a tie-breaker.
Best Teams I've Seen...
Novesta (1999-2002)
SE Louisville (1989)
SE Englewood, CO (1987-88)
Minerva (1978) Dr. Hahlen, I wouldn't forget.
North Terrace (1980)
Best Coaches I've Met...
(Past)
Mike Wileman (Stony Point)
Eileen Smith (Drexel Gardens)
Warren and Beth White (Traders Point)
Bob and Susie Baker (Greenwood)
Chet Coy (Southport Heights)
Eric Derry (River Valley)
Tom Odle (SE Louisville)
Though I know they are controversial, Doug Hurd and Walt Carnes also make this list. No one can deny how well they got kids to play the game.
(Current)
Jim Swindler (Xenia)
Brad Spiers (Novesta)
Dale Harlow (Northfield)
Tracey Chamberlain (Austin)
Best Coach EVER in my opinion: Gary Bordelon (Kissimmee)
Best Programs I have seen...
Valley View (1999-Present)
Mt. Pleasant (2004-present)
Kissimmee (1998-Present)
Top Quizmasters I've seen...
David Strange
Dale Harlow
Anita Zutaut
Carrie Turner
Brad Spiers
Jason Jones
Ann Johnson
Minta Hardman
Ron Russell
Coaches/people that don't get the recognition they deserve for what they do...
Gordon Springer (Capitol City)
Mark Welch (Council Bluffs)
Tracey Chamberlain (Austin)
Robin Zauche (Bible, Garden City)
Brad Harper (SE Parker)
Tina Spicer (Dayspring)
Floyd and Catherine Miller (Union, Terre Haute)
Keith Smith (Orlando)
Bret Talley (Cincinnati)
Gary Coleman (Cincinnati)
Patsy Wilson (LCC)
Mark Young (SE Louisville)
Bob Russell (SE Louisville)
There are, I am certain, countless others that could be on this list. This one is my list and I reserve the right to add to it.
There are so many memories of people and events that I have had through this wonderful program. I have not included everyone that I have met or worked with. That would be impossible. Suffice it to say, that this program of getting me into the Word and the Word into me has made a great impact. Please understand that these are my opinions. I did not leave anyone out intentionally. I may go back and add some as I think of them. I just wanted to get it out and maybe you'll think, too. If you've read these ramblings this far, thanks for reading...
My Favorite Cities for National Tournaments (in no particular order)
Indianapolis, IN
Louisville, KY
Cincinnati, OH
Tampa, FL
Chicago, IL
Least Favorite Cities for National Tournaments
St. Louis, MO
Dallas, TX
Best Comebacks I have ever seen in a game:
SE Louisville vs. College Hts in 1994 placement game in Orlando
College Hts got ten of eleven in the first half, SE L got the last nine and won by just a few points as I remember it.
Stony Point vs. Malvern in 2000 Lincoln Double Elim
SP got 6 of last 7 to win by 15 points against Rene Miller. Later, at JBC, Malvern got revenge.
Stony Point vs Austin in 2009 National tournament to get to the Final Four. (Sorry Ruth) SP trailed by 195 with five questions left. Needing all five and all bonus points, SP got them and won by five.
Best Game Ever...
Malvern vs. Kissimmee in 2005 National Top 12 Winner's bracket game. Both teams tied at 400 at the end of regulation. All questions and bonus answered correctly and evenly. Kissimmee won on a tie-breaker.
Best Teams I've Seen...
Novesta (1999-2002)
SE Louisville (1989)
SE Englewood, CO (1987-88)
Minerva (1978) Dr. Hahlen, I wouldn't forget.
North Terrace (1980)
Best Coaches I've Met...
(Past)
Mike Wileman (Stony Point)
Eileen Smith (Drexel Gardens)
Warren and Beth White (Traders Point)
Bob and Susie Baker (Greenwood)
Chet Coy (Southport Heights)
Eric Derry (River Valley)
Tom Odle (SE Louisville)
Though I know they are controversial, Doug Hurd and Walt Carnes also make this list. No one can deny how well they got kids to play the game.
(Current)
Jim Swindler (Xenia)
Brad Spiers (Novesta)
Dale Harlow (Northfield)
Tracey Chamberlain (Austin)
Best Coach EVER in my opinion: Gary Bordelon (Kissimmee)
Best Programs I have seen...
Valley View (1999-Present)
Mt. Pleasant (2004-present)
Kissimmee (1998-Present)
Top Quizmasters I've seen...
David Strange
Dale Harlow
Anita Zutaut
Carrie Turner
Brad Spiers
Jason Jones
Ann Johnson
Minta Hardman
Ron Russell
Coaches/people that don't get the recognition they deserve for what they do...
Gordon Springer (Capitol City)
Mark Welch (Council Bluffs)
Tracey Chamberlain (Austin)
Robin Zauche (Bible, Garden City)
Brad Harper (SE Parker)
Tina Spicer (Dayspring)
Floyd and Catherine Miller (Union, Terre Haute)
Keith Smith (Orlando)
Bret Talley (Cincinnati)
Gary Coleman (Cincinnati)
Patsy Wilson (LCC)
Mark Young (SE Louisville)
Bob Russell (SE Louisville)
There are, I am certain, countless others that could be on this list. This one is my list and I reserve the right to add to it.
There are so many memories of people and events that I have had through this wonderful program. I have not included everyone that I have met or worked with. That would be impossible. Suffice it to say, that this program of getting me into the Word and the Word into me has made a great impact. Please understand that these are my opinions. I did not leave anyone out intentionally. I may go back and add some as I think of them. I just wanted to get it out and maybe you'll think, too. If you've read these ramblings this far, thanks for reading...
The Roots Aren't Deep Enough
I read a blog about trees today. That sounds a bit strange, doesn't it? Well, I'm on a snow day and the president's news conference was a bit boring...No. Not really. I did have a snow day and I did think the "big" press conference was a bit dry, but I actually looked up the tree blog. Why? I wanted to know about trees that were easily blown down by the wind. I found out that some trees do have a more shallow root system than others, but what happens, more often than not, is that the roots of a tree seek out the water. If the water is down deep in the soil, then the roots are deep. If, though, the soil is dry or sandy, then the roots will be more on the surface where they can catch whatever moisture may be there. Now, I know what some of you are thinking. "Thomas has really lost it. He's pondering trees!" Well, I may have lost it all right, but there is a point to this.
I found it fascinating that some trees could grow really tall and look great. They seemed to be indestructable. But, when a storm rolled through town, those same trees would be lying in the yard or on someone's house. They didn't have the roots to support what grew up top.
As bad as that may be for trees, I think it is even worse for churches. I have been thinking about this quite a bit lately. I have been to a few different churches since I left Stony Point. They are all different. I've been to a mega-church, a large church and a very small church, too. I've even been to a "liberal" church that doesn't believe in the Bible as God's word. I've covered the spectrum. I have had a lot of discussions with church people and leaders about what makes up a "good," "healthy" church. I don't know that there is any one "right" answer. One thing, though, that did strike me, especially among the Christian churches of which I am a part, is the drifting away from a strong, vibrant Sunday School program and a general lack of "challenging" Bible studies. I fear, for what it is worth, that we, the Christian church, are slowly leaving behind our motto of being "a people of the book." I know of quite a few churches that no longer have Sunday School for adults. There are some churches that have a few classes, but the program is generally weak. It seems to me (and I admit I have a very limited perspective), that Bible study 2010 has become a "fill in the blank with the right answer" exercise. I wonder what has happened to the days of wrestling with a text to grasp what it means. It seems to me the "tough questions" don't get asked very often. We seem to want a neatly packaged faith that looks really pretty. I just don't think that kind of faith can hold up in a storm. It just isn't deep enough.
I believe a return to the Bible in 2010 is imperative if we are going to really impact this world and make a stand. There is a real enemy out there that does not want people to know Jesus Christ as the only way to eternal life. He has infiltrated every aspect of our society. Now, more than ever, we must be equipped to battle this enemy. How? Using the Word of God. Jesus fought Satan's temptations in the desert with God's Word (See Matthew 4). The book of Hebrews describes the power of God's Word. It says, "For the word of God is living and active. Sharper than any double-edged sword, it penetrates even to the dividing of soul and spirit, joints and marrow, it judges the thoughts and attitudes of the heart" (Hebrews 4:12). The Bible is powerful. It is God's message to us. It points us to Jesus Christ. It gives us direction and purpose for life. It allows us to stand up to the temptations of this world and our enemy. It is all there; the Bible.
If you are in a church that preaches the Bible as God's inerrant word, then be grateful and encourage your preacher to continue. Let him know how much you admire and need that. Not every clergyman or woman has that view of the Bible. If you are in a Sunday School class that challenges you, tell the teacher. Let him or her know that it makes a difference to you. Christians need to know, read, study and memorize the Bible. It is my hope that 2010 signals a renewal of not only churches growing wide in numbers but also growing deep in faith and in God's Word. Thanks for reading....
I found it fascinating that some trees could grow really tall and look great. They seemed to be indestructable. But, when a storm rolled through town, those same trees would be lying in the yard or on someone's house. They didn't have the roots to support what grew up top.
As bad as that may be for trees, I think it is even worse for churches. I have been thinking about this quite a bit lately. I have been to a few different churches since I left Stony Point. They are all different. I've been to a mega-church, a large church and a very small church, too. I've even been to a "liberal" church that doesn't believe in the Bible as God's word. I've covered the spectrum. I have had a lot of discussions with church people and leaders about what makes up a "good," "healthy" church. I don't know that there is any one "right" answer. One thing, though, that did strike me, especially among the Christian churches of which I am a part, is the drifting away from a strong, vibrant Sunday School program and a general lack of "challenging" Bible studies. I fear, for what it is worth, that we, the Christian church, are slowly leaving behind our motto of being "a people of the book." I know of quite a few churches that no longer have Sunday School for adults. There are some churches that have a few classes, but the program is generally weak. It seems to me (and I admit I have a very limited perspective), that Bible study 2010 has become a "fill in the blank with the right answer" exercise. I wonder what has happened to the days of wrestling with a text to grasp what it means. It seems to me the "tough questions" don't get asked very often. We seem to want a neatly packaged faith that looks really pretty. I just don't think that kind of faith can hold up in a storm. It just isn't deep enough.
I believe a return to the Bible in 2010 is imperative if we are going to really impact this world and make a stand. There is a real enemy out there that does not want people to know Jesus Christ as the only way to eternal life. He has infiltrated every aspect of our society. Now, more than ever, we must be equipped to battle this enemy. How? Using the Word of God. Jesus fought Satan's temptations in the desert with God's Word (See Matthew 4). The book of Hebrews describes the power of God's Word. It says, "For the word of God is living and active. Sharper than any double-edged sword, it penetrates even to the dividing of soul and spirit, joints and marrow, it judges the thoughts and attitudes of the heart" (Hebrews 4:12). The Bible is powerful. It is God's message to us. It points us to Jesus Christ. It gives us direction and purpose for life. It allows us to stand up to the temptations of this world and our enemy. It is all there; the Bible.
If you are in a church that preaches the Bible as God's inerrant word, then be grateful and encourage your preacher to continue. Let him know how much you admire and need that. Not every clergyman or woman has that view of the Bible. If you are in a Sunday School class that challenges you, tell the teacher. Let him or her know that it makes a difference to you. Christians need to know, read, study and memorize the Bible. It is my hope that 2010 signals a renewal of not only churches growing wide in numbers but also growing deep in faith and in God's Word. Thanks for reading....
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)